Stewards led by Damon Hill penalise Michael Schumacher, Mercedes to appeal

 

Michael Schumacher overtakes Alonso 2010 Monaco Grand Prix

Michael Schumacher might be the most successful driver on Monaco, but from this weekend he would be getting another tag of probably being the most unlucky/controversial driver at the Monaco circuit. Fresh on the heels of the controversy that the British media generated about the 2006 Monaco Grand Prix incident.

In the latest incident Michael Schumacher was punished with a 20 seconds penalty which threw him out of the points for illegally overtaking Fernando Alonso. The point of contention here is if he was allowed to overtake Alonso when the safety car went in. The article 40.13 states :

If the race ends whilst the safety car is deployed it will enter the pit lane at the end of the last lap and the cars will take the chequered flag as normal without overtaking.

But the article should not be valid here as the race monitors said Safety car in this lap.

The rules state if the race ends under the safety car period, the order will remain the same, however Michael Schumacher and Mercedes GP contend that since an all clear was given to race the overtaking move on Fernando Alonso was legal and legitimate.

FIA Stewards José Abed (FIA Vice President), Dr. Christian Calmes (a representative of the Automobile Club de Monaco), Paul Gutjahr  announced the verdict alongwith Damon Hill. The text was :

 

Fernando Alonso Monaco Race

The appeal went to the stewards where Michael Schumacher’s old foe Damon Hill was the driver’s representative. A large number of press sources are blaming Hill for the verdict. Also British press sources are very happy about the penalty, totally ignoring another incident that happened in the race, Rubens Barrichello after retiring threw his steering wheel onto the track, but no action was taken.

Michael Schumacher Monaco Race

Schumacher in his defence said :

“The message was ‘safety car in, track clear,’ if that’s given then its racing,” said Schumacher.

 

Damon Hill meanwhile defended himself and was quoted as saying :

“Believe me my only concern was that the right thing was done.

“But there was a wry smile from Michael. Slightly ironic you could say.” said Damon Hill

Ross Brawn also came in defence of his driver Schumacher and was able to demonstrate dissimilar endings at Melbourne. He also mentions the marshalls had waved green flags, a symbol for normal racing to resume.

“We believed that the track had gone green and the race was not finishing under a safety car when article 40.13 clearly would have applied,” said Brawn. “The reason for the safety car had been removed, the FIA had announced ‘Safety Car in this lap’ early on lap 78 and the track had been declared clear by race control.

This was further endorsed when the marshals showed green flags and lights after safety car line one. On previous occasions when it has been necessary to complete a race under a safety car, full course yellows are maintained, as in Melbourne 2009.

On the last lap, we therefore advised our drivers that they should race to the line and Michael made his move on Fernando for sixth place. We have appealed the decision of the stewards.”

In a video he explains that at 15:51 – Safety car coming in was flashed

15:52 – Track Clear was flashed

15:53 – Chequered flag

The appeal looks very promising as the race doesn’t appear to have finished under the safety car as track clear was flashed before chequered flag.

The result of the appeal will be announced by the FIA court of appeals and the result of Monaco Grand Prix is at the moment provisional.




Thank you for reading this post. You can now Read Comments (4) or Leave A Trackback.

4 Responses to “Stewards led by Damon Hill penalise Michael Schumacher, Mercedes to appeal

  • 1
    Abhilash Kushwaha
    May 17th, 2010 20:09

    You really are a big fan of Schimi, aren’t you? Most of the posts have been pro Schumacher and how press is after him. But I can’t imagine how he can have a case here. The rules are very clear there is no ambiguity.

    Now that Schumi is not winning on track he trying to do anything he can (remember him crashing his car in ’94). He has been out qualified by his team-mate (Rosberg) in all but Spain race.

    I think he should have stayed out.

  • 2
    Formula One Addict
    May 17th, 2010 20:20

    Oh yes sir, big fan of Schumacher, but this post isnt about that. The rules are very unclear actually if you keep pace with International media and F1 blogs :)

    The safety car came in at the end of the lap. Track clear status was given, green flags were waved and green lights were on. In contrast , Melbourne 2009 had SC boards and yellow flags all over the place and no track clear status was given by race control.

  • 3
    Abhilash Kushwaha
    May 17th, 2010 20:36

    So tell me this why is it that all the other teams instructed their drivers not to overtake and it was only Brawn/Schumi who decided to do it.

    And Schumi had been trailing Alonso for most of the race and could not get ahead of him. He was able to make a move only because Alonso was not even defending the position.

    So, if he were my hero, I would rather that Schumi actually win a race cleanly.

    You might also remember a race few years back when Barrichelo was leading and Schumi was 2nd. In the last lap the team orders were enacted and Schumi was allowed to win that race. Do you think he deserved that? No one at the grid thought so. In fact his brother went and congratulated Barrichelo.

    This case is similar, I don’t believe Schumi deserves final position ahead of Alonso. It is all a technicality and not racing. You can argue whether the 20 second penalty is fair or not but he certainly doesn’t deserves to be ahead of Alonso.

  • 4
    Formula One Addict
    May 17th, 2010 20:59

    See why Ferrari or McLaren did or did not do something is not part of the argument. Its very simple that the FIA goofed up on this rule and should not have asked race control to wave green flags and put the green light on if it wanted the race to remain under a safety car till the end.

    I would also love to see Schumi winning cleanly and I think this was clean enough. I do not see any dirty tactic here.

    About your point of him winning only because of safety car, there have been 100s of races which have been decided by safety cars, safety cars are a part of racing, we cant say you closed the gap due to the safety car only and hence you dont deserve to win.

    Also, if you notice Alonso did accelerate when Schumacher caught up. Also there was nothing wrong with the racing move.

    About the 2002 Austrian Grand Prix – Michael Schumacher himself had congratulated Barrichello, given him the trophy and let him stand at the top podium position.

    Finally, thanks for your views 8)



Leave a Reply

Note: Any comments are permitted only because the site owner is letting you post, and any comments will be removed for any reason at the absolute discretion of the site owner.

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.